A lifetime lived in the liminal space
between those with petty power
and those whom they would oppress
perhaps without conscious awareness
please believe me when I tell you
it’s not an easy place to be
sometimes a clown or trickster
other times deliberately deferential
with a mousy well-tailored demeaner
soft-spoken and mild-mannered
and a focused observant presence
looking for any possibilities
for building common ground
yet unwilling to compromise integrity
even when it means disregarding
threats and demeaning disrespect
silently healing a bruised ego
because that’s not what is important
when others’ wellbeing is at stake
*
recognizing that one has many choices –
deep sorrow, self-righteous anger,
or patience and compassion for all involved
over lost opportunities to come together
in the exploration of creative, liberating
possibilities based on reason and grace
*
recent events served as a reminder
that my worldview and values
don’t fit well with those of colonial institutions
and those of the gatekeepers and overseers
posted as guards to enforce conformity
often unknowingly – reminding me once again
of the words of Michel Foucault (1979, p. 304).
“The judges of normality are present everywhere. We are in the society of the teacher-judge, the doctor-judge, the educator-judge, the ‘social worker’-judge; it is on them that the universal reign of the normative is based; and each individual, wherever he may find himself, subjects to it his body, his gestures, his behavior, his aptitudes, his achievements. This carceral network, in its compact or disseminated forms, with its systems of insertion, distribution, surveillance, observations, has been the greatest support, in modern society, of normalizing power.”
*
Drawing by Carol A. Hand (based on an adaptation of N. Andry (1749), Orthopaedrics or the art of preventing and correcting deformities of the body in children, cited in Foucault, 1979, inset # 10 between pp. 169-170).
*
It may well be as Foucault suggests
that only some of us are fortunate enough
to know that we are not completely socialized
and carry the responsibility to teach
by thinking critically and “walking our talk”
*
Work cited:
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline & punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books. (Original work published 1975)
Thank you. I needed this. I just saw the title of the book, I was looking for that answer. Your reflection touched me personally. Walking the walk can take many forms. But the requirements are always the same, courage, compassion, patience bottom line. In Buddhism we’ve been in the degenerate age for a few centuries. In Mayan culture we’ve entered the Sixth Sun. So much energy flowing around, it’s a blessing to receive your grounding words.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Such thoughtful, wise, and lovely comments, Skywalker. Thank you, dear friend. 💜
LikeLike
Bursting with the tragic truth of human existence of the dispossessed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much for your thoughtful and powerful comments, Ros. I know your insights and words come from experience. 💜
LikeLike
This is a particularly interesting post Carol, and it has given me food for thought. I am now inspired to read more of Michel Foucault’s work.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much for your thoughtful comments, Ronnie. Foucault’s work is interesting, but it wasn’t easy for me to unpack and understand. I am grateful that I took the time to do so, though. It continues to provide a clear foundation for understanding how socialization continues to limit freedom and imagination.
Recently, I found a wonderful overview. Here’s a link that might be a good place to begin with your exploration of Foucault’s work: https://philosophyindefinitely.wordpress.com/2021/12/03/michel-foucault-epistemes-and-power/. I look forward to hearing about what you think!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the link Carol, I will get back to you later when I have explored a bit more of Foucault’s work.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I look forward to that, Ronnie. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
After I read about Foucault using Jeremy Bentham’s 1787 Panopticon as a metaphor to illustrate his
point, that prison inmates never knew when they were being watched, and therefore always had to act as though they were being watched, which resulted in docility. This reminded me about an article I read online about the increased use of cameras in schools and it used the term “normalization”, which I did not connect to Foucault at the time.
The article was more focussed on the indoctrination of children in Schools in England, and prohibiting teachers from saying anything about Capitalism. The UK Government is also interfering in English universities. That’s another story though. There are a lot of teachers in England, Wales and Northern Ireland who are leaving the profession for various reasons, but the root of the problem is always the Government.
Anyway, coming back to Foucault, I read various articles about his work, and on Academia, I read an interesting article:
On the Implications of
Foucault’s Theory of
Discipline and Punishment in the Educational Setting.
LINK: https://www.academia.edu/4313458/Foucault_in_the_School_Setting
LikeLiked by 1 person
Awesome discussion, Ronnie! You have raised important issues in your thoughtful reflections. Thank you for sharing the link to Mark Carbajal’s (2009) article. He made some very relevant and important points about the ways surveillance and normalization are inextricably interwoven into all social institutions, including prisons and schools. He also describes how faculty and students are both dressaged and coerced into complaint normalization. Reading his work made me even more aware of the role I have played in my life and career as someone who stood between the normalizers in power and those they were trying to normalize. And once again, I find myself attracting the normalizing gaze of those in power. It’s often the reason I have had opportunities to move on to other settings to try to raise awareness elsewhere…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Another thing I find fascinating about Foucault’s work is his message that people at all levels of society and social institutions are subject to the forces of normalization, including the prisoners, guards, administrators, courts, lawyers, onlookers, etc. Most remain unaware of their situation and fail the question the legitimacy of the invisible rules that govern all aspects of their lives.
LikeLiked by 1 person
When I first read your post Carol, I had an image flash into my mind of me sitting in church when I was a boy. As a result, my further exploration of Foucault included his views on religion. After reading a few articles I came across “authoritarian neoliberalism and the alienation of academic labour” which references normalisation.
“In a post-crisis world, the university is being repurposed such that it acts as a vector for the extreme tensions between conditions of production and the forces of production. This incorporates technological and organisational changes, which are materially affecting the technical composition of academic capital. Here, the State represents the normalisation of specific forms of administration that rest upon a legacy of domination, and the exploitative nature of capitalist social relations.”
Richard Hall
Professor of Education and Technology
http://www.richard-hall.org/2018/06/26/authoritarian-neoliberalism-and-the-alienation-of-academic-labour/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting. Often was the time in days long passed that I would take myself driving in the back roads of Kinnelon when in the mood to just expand outside myself. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
The world is indeed a small place, isn’t it, Rob? My grandfather’s farm bordered Smoke Rise, New Jersey. I don’t ever remember my father talking about that, although we visited my grandfather’s farm many times when I was a young child, I only learned about it’s location from someone I met on the commune in Massachusetts where I lived for 4 years in my early 20s.
LikeLike